<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Brothersjudd Forum - Latest Comments in BrothersJudd Blog: FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION:</title><link>http://brothersjudd.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://brothersjudd.disqus.com/brothersjudd_blog_for_future_consideration/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:13:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2008/08/for_future_consideration.html#comment-1986044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Journalism - can you ask questions?&lt;br&gt;Novels - can you tell a story?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both- can you construct a coherent sentence, let alone a coherent paragraph?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They are mistaking the degree for the skill.  There is carpentry, and then there is actual cabinet work.  I can do the one, but not the other.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mikey NTH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:13:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2008/08/for_future_consideration.html#comment-1979098</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If there there's any vocation in desperate need of "de-professionalizing", it's journalism.  Basically a degree in pomposity and self-importance.  I would like to know what H.L. Mencken would think of the idea of a masters degree in reporting!!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Twn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:43:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2008/08/for_future_consideration.html#comment-1947044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So true.  I like to browse new book shelves at the library and book stores, but usually reject books by authors I don't know if the book jacket reveals they are academics.  Sometimes a book will be so highly recommended that I break my rule only to find the  book reads as if it was written by a junior high school student -- bad usage and all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">erp617</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 22:01:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BrothersJudd Blog: FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION:</title><link>http://brothersjuddblog.com/archives/2008/08/for_future_consideration.html#comment-1946898</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It most certainly is a significant factor. In my reporting days at a hard news, "inside Washington" publication that was proudly non-alligned with the MSM axis (this is 20 years ago), a journalism degree was the kiss of death on any resume. A masters in journalism would get you laughed out of the news room. The best reporter was an English bloke who'd never been to college. Tom Wolfe would have been OK with the place. In contrast, several years later, I visited the dean of the Masters of Journalism program at UC Berkeley just to get a glimpse of that world, pretending to be a prospective student. She told me that they tended to discourage heavily any person that had actual journalism experience from applying. I couldn't believe my ears. Tom Wolfe is an excellent novelist magnificently in touch with Reality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">QiaoYang</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 21:43:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>